Senator Hatch Responds To President Obama's Weekly Address

Posted by: Staff in Health Care ReformFiscal Responsibility on Print 

Today, Senator Hatch delivered the Republican response to President Barack Obama's weekly address on the issue of health care reform.

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this video

Transcript: U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch Delivers Weekly Republican Address
August 15, 2009

Hello. I'm Orrin Hatch, from the great state of Utah. Thank you for the opportunity to speak with all of you today to talk about the very important challenge of health care reform.

Ensuring access to affordable and quality health care for every American is not a Republican or Democrat issue -- it is an American issue. Our nation expects us to solve this challenge in an open, honest and responsible manner. More spending, more taxes and more government is not the answer.

After the rushed stimulus bill, Americans are rightly concerned about what is being pushed through the Democratic Congress. The rush to pass something that will affect every American life and one-sixth of our economy has raised concerns all around our nation.

So, why are Americans so skeptical of and concerned with the approach of the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress? A big reason for this concern is that nearly 85 percent of Americans have coverage and they are really worried about what reform means for them. Especially our seniors. And these concerns are moving from kitchen table conversations to town hall discussions.

I am disappointed about the attempts to characterize the behavior of Americans expressing their concerns as 'un-American.' Although I strongly encourage the use of respectful debate in these town halls, we should not be stifling these discussions. There is nothing 'un-American' about disagreements. In fact, our great nation was founded on speaking our minds.

Families are voicing their concerns because they feel like they are not being heard in Washington and I'm here to tell you that your voices are coming through and it is essential for all of you to be involved in this issue.

Republicans in Congress agree with the majority of Americans who believe that just throwing more taxpayer dollars at a problem will not deliver meaningful reform. Telling the American public that the solution for solving a $2.5 trillion health care system is to simply spend another trillion dollars in our current economy, just does not make sense. Especially at a time when spending and debt are multiplying with such alarming speed, like an almost $2 trillion national deficit this year alone, $200 billion in state deficits, a Medicare program on the edge of bankruptcy and a national debt that will triple within the next decade.

There are several areas of consensus that can form the basis for a sustainable, fiscally responsible and bipartisan reform. These include:

  1. Reforming the health insurance market for every American by making sure that no American is denied coverage simply based on a pre-existing condition
  2. Protecting the coverage for almost 85 percent of Americans who already have coverage -- coverage they like -- by making it more affordable. This means reducing costs by rewarding quality and coordinated care, giving families more information on the cost and choices of their coverage and treatment options, discouraging junk lawsuits against doctors and hospitals and promoting prevention and wellness measures like quitting smoking and living a healthier lifestyle
  3. Giving states flexibility to design their own unique approaches to reduce uninsured
  4. Empowering small businesses and self-employed entrepreneurs -- the job-creating engines and lifeblood of our economy -- to buy affordable coverage for their employees

Unfortunately, the path we are taking in Washington right now is to simply spend another trillion dollars of taxpayer money to further expand the role of the federal government. The reform proposals being pushed by the Democrats include massive expansions of the Medicaid program and the creation of a new Washington-run plan that will drive millions of Americans from private coverage of their choice into government-run plans. As the federal government's control of our health care system continues to increase, private coverage will continue to decrease, till we are left with a Washington-run and dictated health care system.

Medicare offers an important lesson. With $38 trillion in future costs, it is facing bankruptcy within the next decade, threatening access to care for millions of Americans. So what is the Democratic approach to fix Medicare for our seniors? Hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts which will be used to expand a financially-strapped Medicaid program and create another government-run plan.

To enact true health care reform, we should work together to write a responsible, bipartisan bill for the American families who are faced with rising unemployment and out of control health care costs.

We have a real need for reform and an opportunity on behalf of the American people to get it done. If we are responsible in our policy approaches and strive for true bipartisanship, we can achieve meaningful reform.

Trackback(0)
Comments (7)Add Comment
0
Get the party names right.
written by ACG, August 15, 2009
"Democrat" is a noun, not an adjective.
0
Human Being
written by Joy Sayler, August 15, 2009
Unfortunately, you don't have a plan that will help anyone except the multi-millionare healthcare executives, big pharma & oil companies.

People are dying everyday because of inactivity of persons (like yourself) who can effect change but don't.

The salaries of these demons could easily pay for much of our healthcare woes. It is because of them that costs have excelerated at such a rate unprecedented in history for ANY industry. Why would they possibly deserve that money? Why do they keep reducing our benefits and increasing our premiums, deductibles and co-pays.

Do you really care. I actually thought that you did, but I now believe otherwise. I had truly hoped that there would be some republicans out there that are not trying to "thin the herd." Apparently you believe that we must just get rid of those unable to pay the outrages sums. After all, no one on a minimum wage could possibly ever afford helathcare.

This is so sick and hurtful.

I believe that it is truly unfortunate that YOU will never have to face these challenges in your life but you should.
0
...
written by Robert Goodwin, August 15, 2009
Very good response to the democratic program. I would place tort reform at the top of the list. Many obgyn doctors have retired eary because they recognize that they must increase the number of patients that they see to unsafe levels in order to afford to pay the insurance fees.
0
Health Coverage
written by Arthur Whittaker, August 15, 2009
The person that wrote the above comment has never lived under socialized medicine. The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence until you get there and you find that it is full of holes that you couldn't see. My wife and I lived in England for a year and a half. We were on the socialized medicine plan. You didn't get to pick your doctor. He or she was assigned to you based on where you live. If you didn't like him or her, too bad, move to another place and then you can get another doctor. If you are over 65 years old and you need a transplant, to bad, you have lived your life, die so that there is more money for the younger people. I have lived with the U. S. government run health care for the past 40 years. Do you want to wait three weeks to see a doctor? That's what it takes me to see a doctor. I could be dead if I have a serious illness before I am seen by a doctor. We need to keep what we have and assist the 15% that don't have health insurance to be able to afford it. Please don't let our government dismantle one of the best health plans in the world in the name of helping 15% of the population. Have you ever thought of the number of people that will be put out of work, people contributing to a better economy, and replaced by a bureaucrat that sucks up more of your tax dollars and doesn't contribute anything to helping you pay your bills. I invite you to look at the other side before you criticize our representatives of being insensitive to our health care needs.
0
Voter who can do math
written by John Cooper, August 16, 2009
"Telling the American public that the solution for solving a $2.5 trillion health care system is to simply spend another trillion dollars in our current economy, just does not make sense. "

Math needs some work there Senator. "Two point five trillion versus one trillion"?

Nope: that's one year for the medical costs versus TEN for the reform estimate.

Dishonest much?

Just because less than four percent wouldn't make the same point isn't a reason to compare ten apples to one orange. Inconvenient truth or not. It "does not make sense" because what the Senator stated isn't true.
0
...
written by C. Norr, August 16, 2009
Like one of the Who's in Dr. Seuss' Who-ville (Horton hears a Who) may I add my voice? "WE ARE HERE! WE ARE HERE"... I am self-employed, uninsured, and worried! (As well as a county and state delegate for the Republican Party.)

I like the sound of your 4 points but am very curious as to HOW you plan to do this. A plan with details will get more respect. Will insurers ever settle for less profit? Why should they when they have 85% of Americans by the throat & paying their exorbitant premiums?

Who defines "affordable"? (Lawmakers are in a very comfortable position here as mentioned in the previous comment.)

Trying to maintain hope in the Republicans...Doing the best I can to take care of myself & my family...and crossing my fingers somebody hears us in time!

C

0
Frustrated Citizen
written by Roland Smith, March 15, 2010
I would suggest that you should consider:
1. Why are health insurance companies "for profit"? Congress made that change a couple of decades ago and can certainly change it back.
2. Why should employers stand between an employee and health insurance? I'd rather that people buy their health insurance directly rather than have a company or a union make that decision. If a company wishes to provide a benefit, let them contribute to a Health Savings Account which the employee can then use to meet their specific health insurance needs.
3. Why isn't health insurance portable? I should be able to easily move from one insurance program to another that better meets my current requirements. Even an annual "open enrollment" would meet this need.
4. Why isn't Medicare as well as congressional health care all included in the same health umbrella? There should be no distinction, and particularly no "special" health care packages available only to a select few.

Do you actually read and pay attention to any of these comments?

Thanks!
Roland

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy