Democrats' Proposals Cost Too Much, Rely On Big Government

Posted by: Orrin Hatch in Health Care ReformFiscal Responsibility on Print 

The following originally appeared as an op-ed in USA Today. -Staff

Affordable and quality health care for every American is neither a Republican nor a Democratic issue -- it is an American issue. Unfortunately, the current health care bills before Congress are too partisan, too expensive and too big-government for most Americans to support.

As congressional Democrats inch towards going it alone on health reform, I ask them to do what American families are demanding -- step back, take a deep breath and start over on a truly bipartisan bill. Using a partisan "reconciliation" process to jam a bill that deals with one-sixth of our economy with 20 hours of Senate debate -- less than one full day -- would be one of the most irresponsible actions that the majority could take.

Last month, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that our nation's deficit for 2009 will be a staggering $1.6 trillion, and our national debt is on a path to double within the next five years and triple within the next decade. And this is all before factoring in the massive price tag associated with the current health care proposals.

We need to take a more targeted approach. The current bill would saddle Americans with higher taxes, more unemployment and fewer health care choices. Not to mention that it would drive our states to bankruptcy and lead us down a path to a Washington-driven health care system.

By focusing on areas of compromise rather than strife, we can reach consensus on a financially responsible and targeted bill that could earn the support of Republicans, Democrats and, more important, American families.

We can reform the health insurance market to ensure that no one is denied coverage or care simply because of a pre-existing condition; provide greater transparency on cost and choice; curb frivolous lawsuits; encourage chronic care management to better control the health of the sickest and most costly patients; and promote prevention and wellness initiatives to keep Americans healthy.

We should also give states the flexibility to design their own unique approaches to reducing the number of uninsured instead of trying to force or foist a one-size-fits-all solution on the states. Furthermore, we need to help small businesses -- the economic engine that creates 70% of American jobs -- and the self-employed to buy affordable coverage by allowing them to band together and buy insurance just like large corporations.

At a time when we are drowning in red ink, and government-run programs such as Medicare and Medicaid are headed for financial insolvency, the last thing we need is another big federal spending bill that puts the focus on Washington instead of our families. It is possible to achieve meaningful and bipartisan reform this year. To do that, however, we must be more responsible and realistic in our health care reform initiatives to craft legislation that we all can be proud of.

Trackback(0)
Comments (3)Add Comment
0
Can we get a little more specific?
written by Matthew McCarty, September 18, 2009
Dear Senator,
It is with great disappointment that I read your op-ed piece on Health Care reform. I'm sure there is a great argument to be made against the current proposals, but you're not making it. Instead of pointing to any specifics in the bills, you are pointing to v*gue generalizations like "The current bill would saddle Americans with higher taxes, more unemployment and fewer health care choices". I'm not sure where you get your crystal ball from, but mine tells me that Americans taxes will be reduced, the unemployment rate will go down and Americans will have better health care choices.

If we do not pass the current proposals before congress, millions of people will die, therefore, any opponent of such bills want to kill people. See, I can do it too.

Sincerely,
Matthew McCarty
0
...
written by Adam Byington, September 18, 2009
Matthew Do have you read the bils? Do you have any idea on how markets work? If you add people to a system of healthcare there is going to be more cost. If they can not afford it (which we can't then someone else gets to pick up the bill. Don't tell me you are going to say "but they are going to take the waste from medicare and put it into the new system. There is not enough waste to even remotely covern what is being proposed. You can't take money from one hand and put it in another and say that you have saved money, all you have done is robbed Peter to pay Paul. Or in this case robbed Grandma and Grandpa to pay d**k and Jane.
0
...
written by Matthew McCarty, September 19, 2009
Adam,
Why is it that you suggested what I might say by starting a quotation, but never ended it? In fact, it reads like I might say the entire second half of your post. As long as you're going to miss my point, I think it's fair game that I miss yours.
Matthew

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy