Latest News

Senator Hatch Responds To President Obama's Weekly Address On Federal Spending

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Today, Senator Hatch delivered the Republican response to President Barack Obama's weekly address on the issue of federal spending and the 2012 budget.


Transcript: U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch Delivers Weekly Republican Address
February 12, 2011

Good morning. I'm Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah.

Last week the nation, and the world, celebrated the centennial of President Ronald Reagan's birth.

Ronald Reagan once told Americans that they faced a time for choosing. The choice then was between the constitutional liberty of free men and women, and a future of higher taxes, bigger government, and less opportunity for families and businesses.

Last fall, American citizens again had a choice to make.

Would they ratify the agenda of trillion dollar deficits and an out of control debt that the President imposed on the nation?

Or would they reaffirm constitutional principles of limited government and free enterprise unhindered by excessive taxation and burdensome regulation?

The American people made their choice in electing historic numbers of conservative Republicans to Congress and in sweeping victories at the state and local level.

Now it is a time for President Obama to choose.

Will he listen to the people, reduce the size of government, and get our spiraling spending and debt under control, or will he become the guardian of an unsustainable status quo?

Next week we will find out what choice President Obama makes, when he releases his budget.

Unfortunately, early indications are that he and his Capitol Hill allies are not taking the nation's spending-fueled debt crisis -- the most critical challenge facing our nation today -- with the seriousness it deserves.

Our massive debt must be confronted immediately. America cannot afford to kick this can down the road any longer. And this challenge cannot be solved with higher taxes that will only result in lower economic growth and less opportunity for our children and grandchildren.

The President's proposal for a freeze in government spending might give the White House a nice talking point. But it is a totally inadequate solution to our nation's spending problems.

Over the past two years, the Administration increased discretionary spending by 24 percent. If you count the so-called stimulus package, spending is up nearly 84 percent.

These levels cannot continue. Business as usual is unsustainable, and job creators know that higher debt today means higher taxes tomorrow.

And if the President's new budget simply freezes his last budget, he'll stifle job growth by continuing to spend too much, tax too much, and borrow too much.

It is beyond irresponsible to saddle the next generation of American citizens with the responsibility for paying back our debt.

By itself, the President's takeover of the nation's health care system will cost $2.6 trillion. And if this new entitlement is like every entitlement before it, the price tag is just going to grow.

Our total debt is over $14 trillion. At over 90 percent of the size of our economy, this is the highest level since 1950.

Think about that. We are spending at a level not seen since the Second World War. By 2021, our public debt is expected to hit $22 trillion with the federal government paying nearly $1.6 trillion ever year in interest payments alone on this debt. We are approaching a real crisis.

Not only does the President want to set these spending levels in stone, he's now talking about new so-called investments -- saying it 10 times in a speech on Thursday -- which is just code for billions in new Washington spending.

This week, the Vice President, advocating for massive new federal expenditures, told Americans to get a grip and get on board with this new spending spree.

With due respect to the Vice President, the American people's grip on this situation is just fine. They know we cannot afford these so-called investments that are financed with taxpayer dollars.

Decisions to reduce spending are not easy ones.

But with leadership, big things can be done. Look at what Governor McDonnell has done in Virginia, and Governor Christie in New Jersey. They have taken on big spending, and they are winning.

The bottom line is we are a nation working on borrowed time -- we have to make some significant changes in order to compete.

We need to reform our tax code.

We need to roll back regulations that hinder businesses large and small.

We need to begin a debate about reforming Social Security and Medicare, so they will be there for our children to depend on when they retire.

We need to ratify free trade agreements with South Korea, Colombia and Panama that will open markets for American innovators and spur job creation in Utah and around our country.

And we need to stop imposing unaffordable financial burdens on our states like the ever-increasing federal expansion of Medicaid.

Yet all of these things will take presidential leadership, and so far the President and the Democrats are missing in action. Indeed, the White House is floating a proposal that could increase the cost of hiring and retaining workers.

Next week, a great debate will begin. The President will send his budget to Congress. And once more Americans will face a time for choosing. Do we accept a future where our children and grandchildren are left holding trillions in IOUs? Or do we get our fiscal house in order, cut spending, and reduce tax burdens on all Americans?

I expect that Americans will choose the course of greater freedom and more opportunity.

The question is whether the Administration will choose to listen to the American people or continue our current spending crisis.

Thank you for listening and God bless America.

Comments
Jerri Housley commented on 15-Feb-2011 01:15 PM
Why don't Republicans tackle Social Security we all know that we are going to have to raise the age of SS to 67. I know it is unpopular but we can't just keep kicking the problem down the road and I think Americans agree that we have to do this.
Beth A. Cottam commented on 15-Feb-2011 01:43 PM
Senator Hatch: I have been a long time supporter your work aimed at fixing problems and increasing self reliance for families.

I know there are needs to reduce and better prioritize use of limited tax dollars. I know we need to keep looking for better ways to improve government and reduce spending.

I spent 35 years of my life working in social support programming and have now retired. I do not speak from a posture to keep or protect my job....(and I never did when employed)... I have see what works and what does not!

There are two issues I urge you to HELP maintain funding levels for because they are GOOD INVENTMENTS IN CREATING SELF SUFFICIENCIES AND SAVING TAX DOLLARS BY ALLOWIING PERSONS TO HELP THEMSELVES.... These two areas are 1) CSBS and 2) Community Health Centers.

I would love to address these two issues more with you or your staff. They have been responsibly utilized in Utah and have produced natural synergy when partnered with other natural supports of community based resources, family participation, faith based organizations, etc.

Without these two sources of federal support MORE FAMILIES WILL BE IN NEED AND MORE MONEY WILL BE SPENT ON MORE COSTLY PROGRAMMING.

I encourage you to have your staff contact me for more specific details on the wise use and value of CSBG and Community Health Centers in Utah. Please help. As a private citizen, I commit to do my part on the community level. Thank you! We need Help to make smart choices with limited funds. Supporting these two budget areas IS smart and will better utilize limited funds to empower families and avoid unnecessary dependencies. Thank you for your support!
John Scharf commented on 15-Feb-2011 03:01 PM
Very persuasive. Thanks Senator Hatch.
Mark commented on 15-Feb-2011 06:47 PM
I think this link sums up the problem.
http://i.imgur.com/SrknW.jpg
Trevor commented on 15-Feb-2011 08:15 PM
Very wise words and very well said.
Deanna Jacobs commented on 15-Feb-2011 08:17 PM
Thanks for this video. Very informative.
Neal Westwood commented on 15-Feb-2011 08:33 PM
Right on, senator! Your comments are fully on the mark. I (we) hope to see you re-elected in 2012. However, we know at least (*part of) the tea pary is gunning for you. Common sense says your firm and passionate position should help you win re-election, and we are frustrated to think that may not be the case. Keep speaking out! *It is my fear that many evangelical Christian members of the tea party are the ones who are after your seat, simply because you are an avowed Latter Day Saint. What do you think of that? And what can be done to temper the effectiveness of their efforts to oust you from your senate seat?
Michelle Hunt ;-) commented on 16-Feb-2011 12:34 AM
Thank you Senator Hatch. I have been very pleased with the newer format you have taken in sending out weekly updates of what Washington is doing, what you are doing and what you are planning to do. One thing I am frustrated with is that no one is challenging President Obama on the decisions he is making and allowing to go forth. As I happen to know, the President may suggest and make up a budget, but it is the Senate that is the final decision maker on approving it. YOU MUST SPEAK OUT VOCALLY AND CONFIDENTLY TO LEAD THE SENATE IN REJECTING THIS BUDGET THAT WE ALL KNOW IS OUTRAGEOUS! Persident Obama is very persuasive when he speaks, but when it comes to the nitty-gritty, he can't give you a straight answer because what he is trying to convience everyone of is only fancy words of more restriction on the American people that we have to pay for. I would stand up even more for you if you would lead the Senate in challenging the President and questioning him on the laws he is forcing on us. The US Supreme Court is hiding and waiting for some to make them take a stand and it needs to be now. I applaud your work and beg you to continue to speak for the average American - who according to Obama's own definition are majorily living in poverty. Thanks for your time.
Bonnie Bourgeous commented on 21-Feb-2011 12:08 AM
It is time to get our fiscal house in order! Thanks for taking a stand
Nadine Terry commented on 21-Feb-2011 04:54 AM
I appreciate your response and the wisdom in your words, and I agree wholeheartedly.
Coralie Lougy commented on 31-Mar-2011 09:02 PM
Bravo! I applaud your work on trying to get a Balanced Budget Amendment passed. It is sorely needed. A agree with you and your reasoning behind it. If it had been done when you first tried to get it passed we would not be in the precarious place we are
now. Keep up the good work.
David Nelson commented on 31-Mar-2011 09:03 PM
The Amendment Idea is too broad, too time consuming and too restrictive. Dave Nelson
Kathleen Mallis commented on 15-Apr-2011 12:32 PM
I wholeheartedly support your stand on support for Planned Parenthood. I urge you to stick to your guns regarding funding. This is a no-brainer. We need to eliminate funding to these social options that may not represent the will of the people. Let Planned
Parenthood raise money like most of the social/medical initiatives such as the Heart Assoc., Cancer Society, etc. If the "people" believe it is important they will contribute.

Post a Comment




Captcha Image



Recent Posts


Tags


Archive